The Innocents

the-innocents-margery-sharp-001I have, as they say, been somewhat in the wars in recent weeks. First there was a bad tooth which got infected and the infection spread into my jaw and throat, then there was the lurgy (a bad cough and cold which wouldn’t clear up), then I slipped on an icy step, landed face down on concrete paving slabs, and ended up in casualty having a CT scan to check everything was OK. Fortunately there’s no serious injury, just severe bruising and a lot of pain, but I feel a little sorry for myself!

Anyway, today is Margery Sharp Day, the first anniversary in a year-long Birthday Book of Under-Appreciated Lady Authors being run by Jane over at Beyond Eden Rock. So I’m posting a hastily scrawled piece about The Innocents, which I have read before, but never written about. However, it’s well worth reading again. On the face of it, it’s a simple tale, but there’s a darker edge to this than some of Sharp’s other work, and the ambiguous ending leaves you wondering about the nature of innocence, and whether a bad act committed for a greater good can ever be sanctioned.

Telling us about the child, the narrator says: “I have spoken of her, describing our first encounter, as a baby. Antoinette was in fact three. At three, she should have been able to untie my shoe-laces quite easily. She should have not only uttered, but prattled. At three Antoinette had still no more language than – a baby.”

And she is as clumsy as baby, easily frightened, and when she is scared she is sick. But gradually Antoinette comes to trust her elderly carer, a relationship develops between the two of them, and the child is accepted by villagers who ‘do not blame her for being an innocent’. “Spoken to always quietly and slowly, Antoinette understood perfectly. All that was needed was patience,” says the unnamed narrator (I’m sure her name is never mentioned – if it is, I missed it). Later she tells us: “Antoinette slowly but surely developed from a small animal into a small child.”

However, that is all she will ever be – a small child. And a very odd small child at that. She spurns toys and games for things like rabbit droppings, and frogs and toads (alive and dead) and although she acquires some language (tureen, vermin, rucksack, pepper) she cannot communicate. The local doctor says she is retarded (a commonly used word when the book wa written in 1971), not autistic, and she needs lots of TLC – and that’s just what she gets with her aging protector. For the spinster, who has little or no experience of children, accepts Antoinette as she is and has no unrealistic expectations or ambitions for her. She loves the little girl, wants her to be happy, and is willing to let her set the pace.

But their idyll is threatened when the war ends and Cecilia, now widowed, returns to England. She aims to take’Tony’ back to America, and employ an army of specialists to turn her into a normal child – a transformation that, as everyone else realises, is simply not possible.

Antoinette is uprooted from her usual routine and environment to stay with Cecilia at the local hotel. Unable to understand what is happening she loses her joy in life, and retreats into dejected, passive acceptance. And as the day of leaving draws closer the narrator becomes more and more concerned that the future being mapped out for Antoinette is not in the child’s best interests, but there is nothing she can do to prevent it… Then, at the 11th hour fate steps in – or, possibly, is nudged in the right direction…

Margery Sharp

I loved this. It’s warm and sensitively written, hitting a balance between light-hearted humour, serious issues, and ethical dilemmas, while exploring the problems involved in caring for a child with special needs, a topic that still tends to be overlooked. Additionally, the characterisation is excellent Margery Sharp can establish a personality in very few words, and builds on the picture as the story progresses, with a word here, and a hint there, until the complete person emerges. Margery Sharp is also very good on descriptions, giving a real sense of place so you can build a picture of the locations, as well as the people.


13 thoughts on “The Innocents

  1. Oh my goodness, you have been through it, and I have to say that you’re making me feel quite lucky to only have a sore throat. I hope you’re on the toad to recovery and that books are being therapeutic. This was the book that made me go out and bang the drum for Margery Sharp, because as well as writing so well and so cleverly she caught the relationship between innocent and carer well. I had a brother who Margery Sharp would have described as an innocent and there were so many little things that she understood perfectly.


    1. I thought the portrayal of the relationship between Antoinette and the narrator was very touching and very true. When I worked on the paper I once did a feature on families with young children with severe learning difficulties who were taking part in an experimental programme, focussing on small tasks – taking one step, holding a toy, making a sound. It was designed to take months to try and achieve just one thing, as naturally as possibly, and the ‘goals’ could be moved or changed along the way. These were children who could never be judged by any normal standards, and would never lead anything remotely resembling a normal life, but it was one of the most moving things I ever experienced, The loving bond between the families and the children was very moving, and it was obvious you had to accept the youngsters as they were and work with thwm, not against them.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, we are about to get a 36 degree HOT day today. I like the open windows but air conditioning needs to be on. So I think I will lie around and read. Hate the strong heat. Tuesday will be 18 and rain. So will read until then, haha.


    1. She handles it in a very human (and humane) way – it’s an area where it would be easy to become maudlin, or fall into sentimentality, but Sharp never falters.


  2. As you know, I read this one too, for the first time. I’ve been thinking more about Cecilia, the way that MS writes about her and how my view of her changed – so skillfully done. Just her constant use of “Tony” says so much – not that a parent can’t choose her own child’s name, but still.

    I do hope you will continue well!


    1. The use of the word ‘Tony’ struck me too, and the way she kept saying ‘Baby’. I don’t think she sees Antoinette as a person at all. She just wants a child as an accessory .


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s